Today, three days of unprecedented
oral arguments on the multi-state lawsuit challenging the health care law
wrapped up.
On Monday, the justices heard 90 minutes of argument to decide
whether the court action is premature – “whether penalties prescribed for those
who do not buy health insurance by 2014 amount to taxes under the obscure 1867
Anti-Injunction Act –the law forbidding tax challenges.” The act states that “no suit for the purpose
of restraining the assessment or collection of any tax shall be maintained in
any court by any person.” “It was designed to make sure that the flow of tax
collection necessary to keep the government running was not disrupted by
lawsuits.”
On Tuesday, the Court heard arguments “about the so-called
“individual mandate.” The argument covered
the central issue of whether Congress overstepped its authority by requiring
Americans to purchase health insurance starting in 2014 or pay a penalty.
On Wednesday, The Court heard arguments on the
Severability issue and Medicaid issue of the Patient Protection and Affordable
Care Act cases.
This has been a historic three days of arguments. Now, we wait . . . 94 days, 93 days. . .
Ernster, the Virtual Library Cat
No comments:
Post a Comment